This page was written, edited, reviewed & approved by Justin C. Olsinski following our comprehensive editorial guidelines. Justin C. Olsinski, the Founding Partner, has 16+ years of legal experience as an attorney.
A federal crime is an offense charged under the United States Code and prosecuted by a United States Attorney in federal district court rather than by a state prosecutor in state court. Federal charges typically carry mandatory minimum sentences, are governed by the United States Sentencing Guidelines, and follow procedures distinct from North Carolina state criminal practice. Charlotte and the surrounding region fall within the U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, where federal charges originating in Mecklenburg, Cabarrus, and 30 other western counties are heard. At the Olsinski Law Firm, our Charlotte federal crime defense attorneys represent clients facing federal indictments throughout the Western District of North Carolina and the greater Charlotte metropolitan area.
| What Is the Difference Between a State and Federal Crime in North Carolina? A state crime in North Carolina is charged under the North Carolina General Statutes and prosecuted by a district attorney in state district or superior court. A federal crime is charged under the United States Code and prosecuted by an Assistant United States Attorney in federal district court. Federal cases use grand jury indictments, follow the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and are sentenced under the United States Sentencing Guidelines, which often include mandatory minimum prison terms not available in state court. |
Federal cases proceed on a different track from state prosecutions, and the differences shape every strategic decision in the defense. A federal case begins with an investigation by a federal agency, the FBI, DEA, ATF, IRS Criminal Investigation, Homeland Security Investigations, or the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, often months or years before any charges are filed. Federal investigators have broad authority to obtain wiretaps, subpoena financial records, and convene grand juries that operate in secret.
A federal prosecution is initiated by indictment from a federal grand jury, not by a warrant from a local magistrate. The Assistant United States Attorney assigned to the case has discretion to choose which charges to bring, and federal prosecutors carry charges through to conviction at high rates because their offices are selective about which investigations they take to indictment.
Once charges are filed, the case proceeds under the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure rather than North Carolina criminal procedure. Discovery, motions practice, pretrial detention determinations, and sentencing all follow federal rules and federal precedent. A defendant who is detained pretrial under the Bail Reform Act at 18 U.S.C. § 3142 may remain in custody for the entire pendency of the case, which can last a year or more.
The Western District of North Carolina, headquartered at the Charles R. Jonas Federal Building at 401 West Trade Street in Charlotte, prosecutes the full range of federal offenses. The categories that appear most often on the Charlotte docket include:
Federal sentencing operates under a framework that gives the judge less flexibility than a state court judge has under North Carolina structured sentencing. Two mechanisms drive federal sentences: statutory mandatory minimums and the United States Sentencing Guidelines.
Mandatory minimums are floor sentences set by statute that the judge cannot go below regardless of mitigating circumstances. For example, 50 grams or more of a mixture containing methamphetamine carries a five-year mandatory minimum under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(B), and 500 grams or more of a methamphetamine mixture—or 5 kilograms or more of cocaine—carries a ten-year mandatory minimum under § 841(b)(1)(A). A § 924(c) firearm conviction adds five years consecutive for a first offense, seven years if the firearm was brandished, and ten years if discharged.
The United States Sentencing Guidelines assign every federal offense a base offense level, which is then adjusted up or down based on offense-specific characteristics, the defendant’s criminal history category, acceptance of responsibility, and other factors. The final guideline range, expressed in months, is advisory after the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Booker, but federal judges in the Western District of North Carolina sentence within or near the guideline range in most cases.
Two narrow paths exist to escape a mandatory minimum. The first is the safety valve under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f), which can apply in certain non-violent drug cases for defendants with limited criminal history who provide full disclosure to the government. The second is a substantial assistance motion under U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1, filed by the government when a defendant cooperates and provides information that aids in the prosecution of others. Whether to seek either of these paths is one of the most consequential strategic decisions in a federal case and should be made only after a careful review of the evidence and the defendant’s exposure.
If you have been contacted by federal agents, served with a target letter, or indicted in the Western District of North Carolina, the decisions made in the first weeks of the case shape its outcome. Federal sentencing leaves little room to correct mistakes made early. Call our Charlotte office at 704-405-2580 for a free consultation, or reach us through our contact form. We are available 24/7.
Because federal sentencing is rigid and federal prosecutors carry cases to conviction at high rates, the defense in a federal case must work earlier and harder than in a typical state prosecution. At the Olsinski Law Firm, our federal defense team examines every stage of the investigation and prosecution for legal challenges that can produce suppression, dismissal, or a meaningful reduction in exposure.
The areas we examine in every federal case include:
Justin C. Olsinski, founding partner of Olsinski Injury, Family & Criminal Lawyers (d/b/a The Olsinski Law Firm, PLLC), is admitted to practice in the U.S. District Courts for the Western, Middle, and Eastern Districts of North Carolina, and in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. He has tried federal cases in the Western District of North Carolina and has secured not-guilty verdicts and dismissals in federal sexual activity cases brought under 18 U.S.C. § 2423, federal drug trafficking cases, and state-level B1 first-degree sex offense and habitual felon prosecutions. He is recognized by the National Trial Lawyers as a Top 40 Under 40 attorney and among the Top 100 Trial Lawyers, and is a member of the North Carolina Advocates for Justice.
The U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina covers 32 counties across the western half of the state. The Western District holds court at five locations under 28 U.S.C. § 113—Asheville, Bryson City, Charlotte, Shelby, and Statesville. Most Charlotte-area cases are heard in the Charlotte Division at the Charles R. Jonas Federal Building.
Most federal cases involving Charlotte-area defendants are heard in the Charlotte Division. Appeals from final judgments in the Western District go to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Richmond, Virginia.
After a federal grand jury returns an indictment, the defendant is either arrested on a warrant or summoned to appear. An initial appearance is held before a U.S. Magistrate Judge, typically within 24 hours of arrest, where the charges are read and counsel is appointed if needed. A detention hearing follows under 18 U.S.C. § 3142 to determine whether the defendant will be released or held pretrial. Arraignment, where the defendant enters a plea, follows soon after.
Federal cases typically take 12 to 24 months from indictment to resolution, though complex cases can take longer. The Speedy Trial Act at 18 U.S.C. § 3161 sets a 70-day clock from indictment to trial, but most cases involve waivers of speedy trial to permit discovery, motions practice, and plea negotiations. Cases involving wiretaps, large document productions, or multiple defendants take longer.
No. Most federal offenses have a statutory maximum but no mandatory minimum. Mandatory minimums apply primarily to federal drug trafficking offenses involving threshold quantities under 21 U.S.C. § 841, firearm offenses under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), federal sex offenses involving minors, and certain repeat offender provisions. Federal white collar offenses generally do not carry mandatory minimums, though the United States Sentencing Guidelines can still produce lengthy advisory ranges in fraud cases involving large loss amounts.
Yes, but the grounds are narrow. A federal indictment can be dismissed for legal defects in the charging document, for violations of the Speedy Trial Act, for Fifth Amendment double jeopardy violations, or where suppression of the government’s evidence leaves insufficient proof to proceed. Outright pretrial dismissal of a federal indictment on the merits is rare. More commonly, suppression motions and guideline challenges reduce the government’s leverage and the defendant’s exposure.
The safety valve under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f) allows certain non-violent drug defendants with limited criminal history to be sentenced below an otherwise mandatory minimum. The defendant must meet five criteria, including limited criminal history points, no use of violence or firearms in the offense, no leadership role, and a truthful proffer to the government of all information about the offense. The proffer requirement is significant and should never be made without counsel present and a clear understanding of the consequences.
Federal cases originating in the Charlotte area are heard in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, Charlotte Division, at the Charles R. Jonas Federal Building, 401 West Trade Street in Charlotte. Final judgments are appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Richmond, Virginia. The Western District covers 32 counties across the western half of North Carolina.
At the Olsinski Law Firm, our Charlotte federal crime defense attorneys represent clients facing federal charges throughout the Western District of North Carolina, including Mecklenburg, Cabarrus, and the surrounding counties. Call our Charlotte office at 704-405-2580 or our Concord office at 704-918-4747 for a free consultation. We are available 24/7.
A federal indictment is among the most serious legal challenges a person can face. Mandatory minimums, guideline ranges driven by quantity and loss-amount calculations, and the resources of a U.S. Attorney’s Office that selects its cases for strength all weigh on the defense. The decisions made in the first weeks, before charges, after a target letter, immediately after indictment, can determine whether the case ends in dismissal, an acceptable plea, or a trial. At the Olsinski Law Firm, our Charlotte federal crime defense attorneys represent clients facing federal charges throughout the Western District of North Carolina, Mecklenburg County, Cabarrus County, and the greater Charlotte metro. Call our Charlotte office at 704-405-2580 for a free consultation, or reach us through our contact form. We are available 24/7.
Mr. Olsinski founded his criminal defense practice in Charlotte, NC, in January 2010. He has successfully defended cases ranging from B1 Felony First Degree Sex Offenses/First Degree Murder to Misdemeanor marijuana charges.
"*" indicates required fields
